Quick rundown : I have not tested those cards and those are only my opinions.
Hey guys I hope you are doing well. How was your week ? Mine was great, finishing Z zone after struggling to do so in previous week is awesome ! I also published my article on Empty rounds all your feedbacks were so great, thank you !
Let's start with the EFC bonuses changes.
Once again, decents +5 have been removed for worst ones. It is very clear that the goal of the +5 is to be given to litterally bad cards and the staff is aiming at slowly removing all the decents +5 options.
It is a reasoning I understand. But I disagree to it. When you look at trashes like Kang, it is hard to get excited playing it. I would rather have +5 turn a decent card like Stenmark to a must have because of her +bonus. Rather than having +5 be a challenge of playing trash like Kang.
At least Sigmund brings excitement with his 6 damages. But Kang ?
But hey, that is only my opinion. What is yours ? I am curious to know what you think about it. Did you take the challenge of playing bad cards ? Was it fun ?
Bonus EFC +2 ajouté : Randal
Another card that has fallen behind in the power creep of 3*. Now you have Pedro that is 7/4 SOA without bonus. At least his SOA is realiable.
Bonus EFC +5 ajouté : Gaia
Meh. You could play her for her sexy image. That is the only positive I see. Playing her 2* is also possible for easy +5.
Miss Pandora
Bad. She is conditional and even in her condition she does not accomplish much.
Belgosi
Thinking about this guy. I understand what the staff aims at. This guy is the definition of trash card you would play to style on your opponent and gain +5 in the process.
Take Jessie of the All-stars. Weaken her bonus and remove her power. You have Belgosi 2*.
Belgosi 3* is about as bad as 2*. And 4* is aweful.
Onik
That card would be good if SOA never existed. It is a shame, he has his strengh (beeing a Murray). but whenever you open him against at least one SOA you expose yourself to your opponent just olding the SOA and moving on or playing a high damage card since you will old Onik. I guess winning an empty turn you opened with a +5 can be interesting.
Kang
Average stats for bad effect. There is nothing to be gained from him.
Daussone
She does have a high differencial for a 3 stars and beeing 6 power is normal for a Rescue I guess. For a +5 why not ?
Now let's look at the exciting part of the news : Semi evos
Shogunn 3* (7/3) Slightly worst Mulligan imo. Bangers does not capitalize on those 6 damages well enough. Yes they can Furry their 4*. But Furry + pillz is mostly a 50/50.
Rodney 2* (7/2) A good 2* to threaten at low pillz.
Ector 2* (7/1) 7/5 on 2*. This looks to be the new standart for 2*, like Lin xia.
X-Panse 3* (8/4) This cards looks very interesting. I will be testing her a bit this week.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire